Determination and perseverance defined by a life…..
“She watched 146 women burn to death because factory owners locked the exits.
Twelve years later, she became the most powerful woman in America.
As a girl, Frances Perkins couldn’t understand why good people lived in poverty.
Her father said the poor were lazy or weak.
Frances, even then, knew that couldn’t be true.
At Mount Holyoke College, she studied physics—safe, respectable, appropriate for a young woman. Then came a class trip that changed everything. Her professor took students to tour factories along the Connecticut River.
Frances saw exhausted girls younger than herself bent over machines in rooms with no windows, no ventilation, no exits. Twelve-hour shifts. Six-day weeks. Fingers lost to machinery. Lungs destroyed by cotton dust.
She realized knowledge meant nothing if it didn’t help people live with dignity.
She abandoned the safe path—marriage to a suitable man, teaching piano to rich children. Instead, she earned a master’s degree at Columbia University in economics and sociology, writing her thesis on malnutrition in Hell’s Kitchen.
Her family was horrified. Nice girls didn’t study poverty. They certainly didn’t live in settlement houses with immigrants.
Frances didn’t care what nice girls did.
By 1910, she was Executive Secretary of the New York Consumers League, investigating factories, documenting violations, pushing for reform. Clean bakeries. Safe exits. Maximum working hours. She testified before legislative committees, a young woman in a tailored suit telling powerful men their factories were killing people.
They hated her. She didn’t stop.
Then came March 25, 1911.
Frances was having tea with friends in Washington Square when she heard the fire bells. She followed the smoke to the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory—ten stories of flame and screaming.
She stood on the street and watched young women jump from ninth-floor windows because the factory owners had locked the doors to prevent “theft” and “unauthorized breaks.” Their bodies hit the pavement like thunder. Again and again and again.
146 workers died. Most were immigrant women and girls. Some as young as 14. They’d been making shirtwaists—the fashionable blouses wealthy women wore to demonstrate their modernity and independence.
Frances watched them burn so rich women could look progressive.
She made herself a promise that day: Their deaths will not be in vain.
Within weeks, Frances was appointed to the committee investigating the fire. She didn’t just write a report. She rewrote New York’s labor laws from the ground up.
Fire exits—unlocked, accessible, clearly marked.
Maximum occupancy limits.
Sprinkler systems.
Regular safety inspections.
54-hour maximum workweek.
One day off per week.
The factory owners fought every provision. They called it “government overreach.” They said it would destroy business. They said workers were trying to get something for nothing.
Frances responded with photographs of the Triangle dead. With testimony from survivors. With cold economic data showing that safe workplaces were more productive, not less.
New York passed the laws. Other states followed. Within a decade, American workplaces had been transformed—not completely, not perfectly, but irreversibly.
And Frances Perkins became the most hated woman in industrial America.
Business groups called her a communist. Newspapers mocked her as an “old maid” meddling in men’s affairs. (She’d married late, to an economist who suffered from mental illness—a fact she kept private to protect him from institutionalization.)
She absorbed the hatred and kept working.
In 1933, Franklin D. Roosevelt—newly elected president facing the Great Depression—asked Frances to join his Cabinet as Secretary of Labor.
She was 53 years old. No woman had ever served in a presidential Cabinet. The idea was considered radical, possibly unconstitutional, definitely improper.
Frances said she’d do it—but only on her terms.
She handed Roosevelt a list of demands:
A 40-hour workweek
A minimum wage
Abolition of child labor
Unemployment insurance
Old-age pensions
Roosevelt looked at the list. “You know this is impossible.”
“Then find someone else,” Frances said.
Roosevelt appointed her anyway.
For twelve years—longer than any other Labor Secretary in history—Frances Perkins fought for those “impossible” demands. And she won most of them.
The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938: 40-hour workweek, minimum wage, child labor restrictions.
The Social Security Act of 1935: old-age pensions, unemployment insurance, support for dependent children.
The laws weren’t perfect. They excluded agricultural and domestic workers—a compromise Frances hated but accepted to get anything passed. Those exclusions meant most Black workers weren’t covered, a racial injustice that wouldn’t be corrected for decades.
But millions of workers—mostly white, yes, but millions nonetheless—gained protections that had never existed before.
Frances was never satisfied. She wanted more. She fought for universal healthcare (failed). She fought for broader coverage (partially succeeded). She fought against every senator and congressman who tried to water down protections.
They called her pushy. Difficult. Unwomanly.
She wore the same black dress and tricorn hat to every public appearance—a uniform that said I’m not here to be decorative. I’m here to work.
When Roosevelt died in 1945, Frances resigned. She’d been in the Cabinet for twelve years—the longest-serving Labor Secretary in American history, male or female.
She could have retired wealthy and celebrated. Instead, she taught labor history at Cornell, writing and lecturing until her death in 1965 at age 85.
Most people don’t remember her name.
But every time you get paid overtime, that’s Frances Perkins.
Every time a workplace has a clearly marked fire exit, that’s Frances Perkins.
Every time someone collects Social Security or unemployment insurance, that’s Frances Perkins.
Every weekend you have off, that’s Frances Perkins.
She stood on a street in 1911 and watched 146 women die because profit mattered more than human life.
And she spent the next fifty years making sure that would never be true again—at least not legally, not without consequence, not without someone powerful enough to fight back.
She didn’t just witness injustice. She built the architecture that made justice possible.
Her father said the poor were lazy or weak.
Frances proved that poverty was a policy choice—and policy could be changed.
She was the first woman in a presidential Cabinet. But that’s not why she mattered.
She mattered because she looked at burning women and said never again—and then spent her life making that promise real.
Most people don’t know her name.
But every person who’s ever received a paycheck with overtime pay, every child who went to school instead of a factory, every elderly person who retired with dignity—they’re living in the world Frances Perkins built.
One fire. 146 deaths. Fifty years of fighting.
And a country that learned, slowly and incompletely but irreversibly, that workers are human beings who deserve to live.”
From a FB page The Inspirest…10/30/25
My reflection:
When I was growing up I think I must have read every biographic work in the little Carnegie Library in my home town. I still love articles, books, and movies that are life stories that reveal how God uses those whom He has created with particular sensitivities, calls, talents, and gifts….
When I was a candidate for deacon ordination in The Alabama West Florida Coference of The UMC, in my first ordination interview after two years of commissioned provisional status, after what seemed like two hours of what felt like grueling and dismissive and even, at moments, a contemptuous attitude from the committee chair, a former attorney-turned-preacher, The Reverend Kathy Knight, at the end of the interview, she said to me , with a bit of a smirk, “Thank you for your passion.” There was no doubt in reading the meaning….. passion was not something that had value, in her opinion. It reminded me of how the Anglicans (and most other groups of Wesley’s day) had a high degree of disdain and suspicion for “experience” of spiritual fervor and Holy Spirit activity in one’s life. The Enlightenment had elevated educated reason and high-church tradition, along with Scripture, over the personal “heart-warming” Aldersgate experience that would come to mark early Methodism and lead, even further, to the early 20th century emergence of the Pentecostal Movement.
I had already heard through the grapevine that some on the Board of Ministry had observed among themselves that my particular district had a practice of endorsing candidates that lacked the gravitas and educated demeanor that was expected of ordained clergy.
The committee had required no less than three psychological evaluations of me, and in the third one explicitly directed the mental health professional to focus on several DSM mental health diagnoses. After several sessions with me she said, “These people really don’t know you, do they?”
At the end of it all, it was a blessing to have been rejected by the grasping claw of a religious institution. I had asked God in that first ordination interview what in the world was happening in that moment and His quick reply in my spirit was, “This is not about you. It is about a bigger battle in the heavenlies. Watch and wait.” I did a lot of watching, waiting, and listening in the next three years. As the 2016 interview was approaching God spoke pressingly and frequently with “deadwood is being pruned.” As it it was apparent I was being cut from the process, I asked the Lird directly, “Am I the deadwood? Or my congregation? My district, My conference? Our denomination? The church universal? “. I got no answer until after the saga ended a year later. In God’s timeless, yet perfectly timed moment, “Deadwood pruning.” I remembered my question and, knowing full well that’s where my mind would go, God replied, “All of them.” I was immediately reminded that pruning is always occurring on the branches of Christ’s vine where fruit is diseased or absent so that more and better fruit may come forth. I laughed at my ability to have been so caught up in the impact on me that I failed to see the bigger picture of God’s continual work among us all! God had chosen to deal with my grief over what I had observed since the early 90’s in the institutional church by first immersing me in it, then removing me from it. It was exactly the same as He had in 1997 immersing me in the reality of the spiritual realm in the midst of the physical realm to give me the vision and discernment to see the source of influences separate from the persons involved in order to stretch my ability to see and hear Him at work in circumstances better.
CBB 10/30/25